23 Jun 2026
by Tom McGee

The Industrial Strategy: One Year On

Today (23 June) marks one year since the UK government launched the Industrial Strategy’s Digital & Technologies Sector Plan, which contains over 50 commitments to support and grow the UK’s tech sector. Drawing on government announcements, feedback from techUK members, and Public First polling, we assess the progress of the D&T Sector Plan and make recommendations for its second year. 

Overall, early implementation – with the notable exception of electricity support for digital infrastructure – is broadly encouraging. However, for the D&T Sector Plan to generate tangible, long-lasting impact in the tech sector, policy stability and certainty are now required. Therefore, on the day after Keir Starmer announced his resignation as Prime Minister, techUK calls on the next government to maintain its commitment to the ten-year D&T Sector Plan and continue to play an active and strategic role in developing the UK’s tech sector.  

Implementation is broadly positive… 

As techUK’s D&T Sector Plan Tracker shows, implementation of the government commitments has been good over the first year. 60% of the Plan’s commitments have been implemented, just 5% of commitments have not been implemented, with the remaining 35% partially implemented.  

Progress includes: 

  • Almost £4 billion in R&D funding allocated to the Plan’s six frontier technologies, part of the government’s total £86 billion R&D investment between 2026/27 and 2029/30 
  • Slowly but surely unlocking pension fund capital to drive investment in tech companies, through the British Business Bank’s British Growth Partnership Fund I and the passage of the Pensions Schemes Act 2026 
  • Establishing the Global Talent Fund to support the relocation of international researchers to the UK 
  • Up to £2 billion to invest in quantum technology development, skills and facilities, with £1 billion earmarked for procuring large-scale quantum computers 
  • Setting up the Local Innovation Partnerships Fund, backed by up to £500m, to develop innovation clusters across the UK 

Despite this, there is a notable lack of progress in other areas: 

  • Electricity – both costs and the speed of grid connections – is still a significant barrier for digital infrastructure 
  • Government delayed its decision on AI and copyright, at a time when the UK’s international competitors are moving ahead with clearer enabling frameworks for AI innovation 

Overall, however, the D&T Sector Plan has largely followed through on the commitments it set out.  

…but impact remains uncertain 

Implementation is the relatively easy part. Most of what the government has achieved so far – allocating funding, passing legislation, establishing programmes, publishing additional plans and strategies – are an essential and encouraging first step, but they focus on inputs and not outcomes. These initial achievements – which the government summarises in its D&T Sector Plan: Year One Update and deserves credit for – do not guarantee successful delivery of these policies. Implementation is not the same as impact.   

Indeed, the tangible, real-world impact of the D&T Sector Plan on techUK’s members and the technology sector is still very uncertain. Based on feedback from members, just two of the Plan’s 13 areas of focus (15%) are already generating significant positive impact amongst the sector: access to finance and quantum.  

On access to finance, the British Business Bank recently made a £100m commitment to Oxford Quantum Circuits, the BBB’s largest direct equity investment. This exceeds its commitment in the D&T Sector Plan to make “direct investment of up to £60m”. Additionally, the BBB – through its Industrial Strategy Growth Capital initiative – is making larger fund commitments, such as the recent £150m cornerstone commitment to Playground Global’s new UK-focused deeptech fund. Pension capital is reaching UK scale-ups, such as techUK member Wayve, via the British Growth Partnership Fund. The National Security Strategic Investment Fund and others have invested in Seraphim, a SpaceTech investment group. These examples of encouraging early impact appear to be broadly consistent with Public First polling (February-March 2026), commissioned by techUK, which found that a majority of UK tech businesses find access to finance easy (54%), although this varies between large businesses (67%) and SMEs (42%). Therefore, despite this positive initial impact, more work remains to be done on access to finance.  

As for quantum, there seems to be genuine excitement amongst techUK members that the £2 billion quantum investment package – substantially more than the £670m commitment initially set out in the D&T Sector Plan – will enable the UK’s quantum sector to scale. The establishment of ProQure, the world’s first large-scale government procurement initiative for quantum computers, acts as a clear signal to industry and gives them the confidence to invest and innovate in the UK. Applications for ProQure’s first phase closed in May and contracts will be announced in October. Although some techUK members have called for a clearer breakdown of the £2 billion investment package and emphasise the need for greater focus on quantum skills, the early impact of the D&T Sector Plan on the quantum sector is largely encouraging.   

Beyond access to finance and quantum, almost all of the Plan’s other areas of focus have seen some impact, but the full extent of this impact remains to be seen. For example, there is optimism amongst the sector around R&D – due to the record £86 billion public R&D investment between 2026/27 and 2029/30, including almost £4 billion allocated to the six frontier technologies – and this is expected to have a substantial impact soon. Under AI, some impact from individual interventions in the D&T Sector Plan is already visible, as the Sovereign AI (Sov/AI) Fund has taken direct equity stakes in three AI companies and signed compute agreements with six more. But it is too soon to know how the Plan’s full set of interventions will impact the AI sector, particularly given the very recent announcements on AI adoption and the ongoing uncertainty around AI Growth Zones and AI and copyright.  

Only one of the Plan’s areas has produced a negative impact. The exclusion of digital infrastructure from accessing support for high electricity costs – supposedly one of the centrepieces of the Industrial Strategy – is consistent with the techUK-Public First polling. 37% of tech companies cite energy costs as the greatest weakness of operating in the UK, the highest in this category. This is reinforced by feedback from techUK members: data centres report that high UK electricity prices make it more expensive to operate a data centre in this country than in the United States, France or Sweden. In the telecoms sector, the cost of electricity constrains network upgrades and innovation.     

The ‘gap’ between implementation and impact is not surprising – but stability is now key  

A relatively high rate of implementation (60%) compared with a relatively low rate of impact (15%) is not a cause for concern. Many of the D&T Sector Plan’s interventions will take years to bear fruit: it is still too soon to tell the full impact of the Plan’s policies relating to R&D, skills, regulation or international partnerships, even if their implementation is broadly on track.   

This is why policy stability and consistency are now crucial to ensure the D&T Sector Plan’s successful delivery and impact. There is one small caveat to this: it is important that the D&T Sector Plan acts as a “living document” and maintains some flexibility to adapt and respond to the evolving economic and technological landscapes. Nonetheless, the Industrial Strategy set out a clear approach and ten-year direction of travel to 2035 and this government – and its successors – must continue to adhere to it. This is reinforced by Public First’s polling: stable government policy is one of the most important factors in supporting business growth, selected by 20% of technology businesses. 

What might ‘Manchesterism’ mean for the Industrial Strategy?  

Keir Starmer’s resignation as Prime Minister yesterday makes it likely that Andy Burnham will become the UK’s next Prime Minister. What would the former Mayor of Greater Manchester mean for the stability and longevity of the D&T Sector Plan and the broader Industrial Strategy? 

Burnham’s actions and words as Mayor of Greater Manchester (2017-2026) provide us with several clues.  

First, the Greater Manchester Combined Authority (GMCA) published five Sector Development Plans in November 2025, several months after the UK Industrial Strategy was launched. The GMCA’s five chosen sectors – Advanced Materials and Advanced Manufacturing; Creative Industries; Digital, Cyber & AI; Health Innovation & Life Sciences; Low Carbon – map very closely onto the national government’s eight Industrial Strategy sectors (IS-8). The Sector Development Plans explicitly refer to the importance of aligning the GMCA’s work with the national Industrial Strategy.  

Second, in January 2026, at the launch of these Sector Development Plans, Burnham spoke of the need to “reindustrialise the birthplace of the industrial revolution [Greater Manchester]”. This would require government to adopt a “new, more assertive and confident…interventionist approach”.  

Third, in his first term as Mayor in 2019, Burnham and the GMCA collaborated with the UK government to publish Greater Manchester’s Local Industrial Strategy. This shows that Burnham has a relatively long-standing interest in the role that government – both national and regional – can play in developing strategic parts of the economy. 

From all this, we can infer that Burnham recognises the value of an active state and has a track record of supporting strategic sectors and technologies through targeted industrial policy. techUK would urge a hypothetical Prime Minister Burnham – or whoever succeeds Keir Starmer – to stick with the D&T Sector Plan and UK Industrial Strategy; in the face of political instability, policy predictability for the Strategy is essential.  

The Industrial Strategy has strengthened some policymaking coherence and clarity… 

Greater Manchester’s Sector Development Plans are just one example of the Industrial Strategy influencing other areas of policymaking. Increasingly, the UK Industrial Strategy – and the IS-8 sectors – are becoming a ‘golden thread’ for government policy. For example, the government’s AI Adoption Summit on 8 June focused on accelerating adoption throughout the IS-8. Innovate UK’s business support “will focus on six of the eight Industrial Strategy priority sectors”.  The forthcoming Scale-Up Concierge Service is also expected to target the IS-8. There are many other instances of this occurring throughout the different levels of government.  

Some techUK members reported that the framework of the Industrial Strategy is making it more straightforward to engage with government policy or access support. This represents an intangible benefit of the Industrial Strategy, which complements the more tangible impacts of the D&T Sector Plan outlined above. Such policy coherence must now be allowed further time to embed itself.    

…but tensions and inconsistencies in government policy persist 

Despite the ‘golden thread’ of the IS-8, a frustrating lack of coordination still exists between different strands of government policy. Three glaring examples stand out.  

First, according to the D&T Sector Plan, the government appears committed to “attracting top tech talent to the UK” including through the £54m “Global Talent Fund designed to attract world-class researchers, together with their teams, to move to the UK.” However, this ambition is undermined by contradictory parallel reforms to the immigration system that are making it more complex, costly, and time-consuming for skilled migrants, and their dependants, to come to, work in, and settle in the UK, potentially acting against the goal of attracting and retaining the very talent the Fund is designed to bring in. 

Second, through the D&T Sector Plan, the government commits to “an enduring partnership with business” and reforming the “business environment”. However, unhelpfully, the current government has raised employment costs (e.g. by increasing the rate of employer National Insurance contributions, while lowering the threshold at which employer NICs is charged) and business rates on much of the tech sector. This helps to explain why, according to Public First’s polling, 56% of tech businesses say the current UK operating environment makes expanding their business challenging and 27% believe the operating environment has got harder in the past year. Relatedly, 36% of tech businesses name the high level of tax as the greatest weakness of operating in the UK, the second-biggest concern.  

Third, the D&T Sector Plan emphasises the important links between the technology and defence sectors. Similarly, the Strategic Defence Review (June 2025) and Defence Industrial Strategy (September 2025) highlight the need to invest in cutting-edge technologies to strengthen the UK’s defence and national security. However, the repeated delays to the Defence Investment Plan and the government’s unwillingness to meaningfully increase defence spending risk harming the defence technology sector and damaging business confidence.   

The Industrial Strategy does not exist in a vacuum. Its implementation and impact are also determined by other government policies. It is therefore critical that government becomes more joined up and starts pulling in the same direction. 

Conclusion & Recommendations 

As the D&T Sector Plan enters its second year, techUK makes four recommendations to the government – and its possible successors – to improve the Plan’s delivery and drive impact: 

  • Re-commit to a genuinely long-term approach. Impact takes time, so it is important to insulate the ten-year D&T Sector Plan from policy instability and, as far as possible, political change. 
  • Drive down energy prices for digital infrastructure, for example by moving all levies from energy bills to general taxation. According to techUK-Public First polling, 37% of tech businesses called for support with their energy prices, the second-most popular policy request.   
  • Accelerate AI adoption throughout the economy. Technology is a priority sector in its own right; it is also a key enabler of growth in other sectors of the economy and the widespread adoption of technologies such as AI is core to this. The government must build on the commitments of the recent AI Adoption Summit to drive responsible AI adoption throughout the IS-8 sectors, leveraging the new AI Adoption Coalition convened by techUK and seven other trade associations.  
  • Improve cross-government coordination, to reduce contradictory and inconsistent policies that harm the D&T Sector Plan. 

The prize is there for the taking. If the UK improves its business environment – including through the full and proper delivery of the D&T Sector Plan – 74% of tech firms say their business would grow and 65% say they would increase headcount. And when the tech sector grows, so does the rest of the economy: 91% of tech businesses and 85% of non-tech businesses believe the tech sector plays a significant or vital role in driving UK economic growth.  

Industrial Strategy One Year On: Reviewing the Digital & Tech Sector Plan

On 16 July from 13:00 – 14:30, techUK will convene a roundtable with a senior government representative (TBC) from DSIT or DBT and leaders from across the tech sector to review the implementation of the Government’s Digital & Tech Sector Plan, one year on from its publication.

Book now


Unless otherwise specified, all polling refers to polling commissioned by techUK and conducted by Public First between 24 February and 6 March 2026. Public First polled 531 businesses (275 tech businesses and 256 non-tech). More information can be found here and full results can be found here

techUK's Policy and Public Affairs Programme activities

techUK helps our members understand, engage and influence the development of digital and tech policy in the UK and beyond. We support our members to understand some of the most complex and thorny policy questions that confront our sector. Visit the programme page here.

 

Upcoming events

Latest news and insights 

Learn more and get involved

 

Policy Pulse Newsletter

Sign-up to get the latest tech policy news and how you can get involved in techUK's policy work.

 

 

Here are the five reasons to join the Policy and Public Affairs programme

Download

Join techUK groups

techUK members can get involved in our work by joining our groups, and stay up to date with the latest meetings and opportunities in the programme.

Learn more

Become a techUK member

Our members develop strong networks, build meaningful partnerships and grow their businesses as we all work together to create a thriving environment where industry, government and stakeholders come together to realise the positive outcomes tech can deliver.

Learn more

 

Meet the team 

Antony Walker

Antony Walker

Deputy CEO, techUK

Nimmi Patel

Nimmi Patel

Associate Director - Skills & Talent Policy, techUK

Doniya Soni-Clark

Doniya Soni-Clark

Associate Director of External Affairs, techUK

Tom McGee

Tom McGee

Associate Director, Digital Economy, techUK

Dan Johnston

Dan Johnston

Head - Public Affairs, techUK

Edward Emerson

Edward Emerson

Head of Digital Economy, techUK

Samiah Anderson

Samiah Anderson

Head of Digital Regulation, techUK

Matt Robinson

Matt Robinson

Head of Nations and Regions, techUK

Jake Wall

Jake Wall

Policy Manager, Skills and Future of Work, techUK

Daniella Bennett Remington

Daniella Bennett Remington

Policy Manager - Data and AI, techUK

Luke Newcombe

Luke Newcombe

Programme Manager – Local Public Services and Nations and Regions, techUK

Stephanie Barr

Stephanie Barr

Programme Manager, SME Engagement and Nations & Regions, techUK

Oliver Alderson

Oliver Alderson

Junior Policy Manager, techUK

Tess Newton

Junior Policy Manager, techUK

 

Related topics

Authors

Tom McGee

Tom McGee

Associate Director, techUK

Tom McGee is Associate Director for Government Affairs, with a particular focus on techUK’s Digital Economy workstream and Nations & Regions programme.

Tom joined techUK in 2026 from the OECD’s Science, Technology & Innovation Directorate, where he specialised in semiconductors policy, providing analysis and recommendations on industrial policy and supply chain resilience to the OECD’s member countries and partner economies. Tom also has considerable experience in the UK Civil Service, as a Senior Policy Advisor (at the Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy and Cabinet Office) and Ministerial Private Secretary (Department for Education).

Tom holds a Master’s in Public Policy from Harvard University, where his studies were generously funded by the Knox Memorial Fellowship. His Master’s thesis – on AI chips and industrial policy – was awarded the Harvard Kennedy School’s top prize for outstanding policy analysis. Tom also holds a BA from the University of Cambridge.

Email:
[email protected]

Read lessmore