06 Nov 2025
by Hayley Brady

Who's accountable for the online safety gap?

Online safety has become an invidious topic, with the widespread agreement on the necessity of online protections not extending to how best to guarantee those safeguards without compromising fiercely held individual freedoms and innovation.  

Each jurisdiction has struck its own balance, creating competing obligations for businesses all over the world, not just the social media, messaging and search engine platforms provided by Big Tech. Compliance in one country could mean competitive disadvantage in another, or even contravening established data privacy laws. 

Companies have started building dedicated teams and broadening the scope of existing staff to meet the urgency and scale of the task, with many regulators having already launched enforcement actions. The interactions between business and regulators at this early stage will set the tone of things to come, with some companies scrutinising the validity of enforcement decisions, the reach of certain regulations, and the demarcation of freedom of speech from hate speech. 

This is why online safety is so difficult: it places fundamental rights (and regulatory regimes) on a collision course. Creating a strategy which is compliant but adaptable will be a major challenge.  

The tech industry could adopt a high water mark approach, meeting the most stringent standards – such as those of the EU, UK or Australia – to ensure global compliance. But companies would likely suffer commercial disadvantages in certain markets and regulatory differences across jurisdictions would make total compliance unlikely. A single approach is not the answer. 

And yet, a bespoke playbook for every major jurisdiction would prove prohibitively costly and cut against the borderless operating models used in messaging platforms and social media. Meanwhile, pulling out of high-risk jurisdictions entirely would be unworkable due to revenue loss and reputational fallout.  

Most companies will benefit from a hybrid approach, where global standards designed to meet requirements in leading jurisdictions like the US or EU are combined with comprehensive regulatory mapping to identify gaps and the minimum changes required to meet obligations in other markets. 

But the global online safety drive has only just started and lawmaking will continue, with static legislation singularly ill-suited to governing technology. This push by governments is unlikely to be uniform: convergence in one area will likely be offset by divergence in another.  

In the first of our Code≠Law series exploring the rapidly evolving field of technology regulation, we explain the emerging online safety rules around the world, offer clear lessons on compliance, and explain the best strategies for engaging with regulators. Read the full report on our website – Trust at risk: Who is responsible for the online safety gap? 

Author

techUK's Policy and Public Affairs Programme activities

techUK helps our members understand, engage and influence the development of digital and tech policy in the UK and beyond. We support our members to understand some of the most complex and thorny policy questions that confront our sector. Visit the programme page here.

Upcoming events

Latest news and insights 

Learn more and get involved

 

Policy Pulse Newsletter

Sign-up to get the latest tech policy news and how you can get involved in techUK's policy work.

 

 

Here are the five reasons to join the Policy and Public Affairs programme

Download

Join techUK groups

techUK members can get involved in our work by joining our groups, and stay up to date with the latest meetings and opportunities in the programme.

Learn more

Become a techUK member

Our members develop strong networks, build meaningful partnerships and grow their businesses as we all work together to create a thriving environment where industry, government and stakeholders come together to realise the positive outcomes tech can deliver.

Learn more

Meet the team 

Antony Walker

Antony Walker

Deputy CEO, techUK

Alice Campbell

Alice Campbell

Head of Public Affairs, techUK

Edward Emerson

Edward Emerson

Head of Digital Economy, techUK

Nimmi Patel

Nimmi Patel

Associate Director for Policy, techUK

Samiah Anderson

Samiah Anderson

Head of Digital Regulation, techUK

Audre Verseckaite

Audre Verseckaite

Senior Policy Manager, Data & AI, techUK

Mia Haffety

Mia Haffety

Policy Manager - Digital Economy, techUK

Archie Breare

Archie Breare

Policy Manager - Skills & Digital Economy, techUK

Daniella Bennett Remington

Daniella Bennett Remington

Policy Manager - Digital Regulation, techUK

Oliver Alderson

Oliver Alderson

Junior Policy Manager, techUK

Tess Newton

Team Assistant, Policy and Public Affairs, techUK

 

 

Authors

Hayley Brady

Hayley Brady

Partner, Head of Media and Digital, UK, Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer

Hayley heads our media and digital practice, in London, and assists clients on global strategic and innovative arrangements.  Hayley has spent time in industry on secondment at Sky, acted as quasi-in house counsel at FilmFlex Movies for a number of years and undertook mini secondments at OSN in Dubai.

Her practice is split into two: (i) advising both media companies and those in other sectors on media and entertainment matters including significant content licensing, partnering, joint ventures, regulation and marketing, sponsorship and advertising; and (ii) advising growing digital companies on partnering and product/geographical expansion and traditional companies on moves to new digital platforms.

Hayley is listed in Legal 500 as a Rising Star lawyer in the fields of (i) film and TV; (ii) computer games; (iii) digital media; and (iv) advertising, and also won the Lawyer Monthly Women in Law 2018 Award for expertise in Tech law.  Hayley is referred to in legal directories as ‘extremely personable and bucks the trend of the average senior corporate city lawyer. She is also hugely knowledgeable and has really strong relationships in the media and entertainment industry', ‘bright, has bags of stamina, and is a great problem solver’ and ‘calm, focused and will work as long, and as hard as required’.  Hayley is author of the PLC note "Overview of Broadcast Content Regulation", a member of several industry bodies (including Women in Film and Television, the Royal Television Society and the Beverly Hills Bar Association).  Hayley regularly holds several speaker spots at media events and runs a very successful Media Law Summer School event.