Guest blog by Michael Thomas, Role & Company Engagement lead at Marvell Consulting #techUKdigitalPS
Michael Thomas
Role & Company Engagement lead, Marvell Consulting
More than a decade has passed since the establishment of the Government Service Standard, and much has improved in how public services are designed and delivered. We've seen a significant shift toward user-centred, agile, and service-led digital transformation. Yet, across central and devolved government, health, and regulatory bodies, we continue to encounter a persistent, foundational challenge: the quality, structure, and interoperability of public sector data.
Good data is the foundation of digital transformation
At its core, digital transformation is not just about shiny new front ends or migrating services to the cloud. It's about making services better, faster, and fairer for the people who rely on them. And in every case, that transformation depends on the quality of the underlying data.
From health records to building control applications, and from licensing to grant management, the problems we encounter often share a common root: fragmented, poorly structured, or inaccessible data. We’ve worked on projects where sports scientists were gathering unstructured application data on digital forms, where caseworkers had to re-key information across multiple systems, and where decades-old data is effectively held hostage by proprietary vendor formats.
This isn’t just inefficient—it’s risky. Poor data quality can lead to flawed decision-making, barriers to automation, and reduced public trust.
AI is only as effective as the data it consumes
There’s a great deal of excitement around AI and automation in the public sector. At Marvell, we believe in the promise of these technologies, and we’ve helped departments assess how to deploy them responsibly. But we also stress a critical caveat: AI is only as good as the data it’s trained or applied on.
While machine learning models can assist in data cleaning, classification, and insight generation, they cannot make up for fundamental weaknesses in how data is gathered, stored, and governed. In fact, bad input data can generate misleading, biased, or harmful outputs. That’s why we urge public sector organisations to focus on fixing data at the source—embedding better data practices throughout the service lifecycle.
What does "better" look like?
From our perspective, improving public sector data means working across several fronts:
1. Collect more structured data at source
Rather than relying on AI to clean messy data downstream, we should design services that encourage structured data capture from the outset. Good form design, controlled vocabularies, and thoughtful content strategy can reduce ambiguity and increase the value of data the moment it is submitted.
2. Join up data across systems
We regularly see services fall short because they treat data as bounded by the system that collected it. But citizen journeys rarely map neatly onto a single system. We’ve worked with a Welsh public body to implement cross-cutting reference data—linking health, education, and local authority datasets to deliver more accurate, reliable insights and services–and enable more comprehensive data analysis. The key enabler here is adopting data standards and investing in robust APIs and data-sharing agreements.
3. Improve data governance
Good governance enables safe and effective data sharing across departments. One example comes from a cross-departmental team of volunteers, working to support efforts to tackle modern slavery, where data from councils, the Food Standards Agency, and enforcement teams needed to be combined to identify risks and support victims. They highlighted that achieving this required not just technical integration, but careful data stewardship, legal assurance, and clear accountability.
4. Work in the open
Cross-departmental collaboration also improves when teams can see, share, and build on each other’s work. We always promote open standards, open source, and open documentation as defaults. This not only boosts efficiency and innovation but also avoids the vendor lock-in traps that have historically plagued public sector IT.
Avoiding the mistakes of the past
Many of the most frustrating data challenges we’ve helped clients solve stem from decisions made years ago—long-term vendor contracts with closed formats, brittle integrations, and unclear data ownership. As departments embrace new technologies, we mustn’t forget the lessons of the past. Data must be treated as a strategic asset: owned by the public, stewarded by the government, and protected with care.
That means designing for future flexibility: ensuring data is portable, standards-compliant, and decoupled from specific applications. It means investing in upskilling civil servants in data literacy and governance, and in creating the conditions where services can evolve without being locked into inflexible legacy solutions.
Looking forwards
If we want the next decade of public sector transformation to succeed, we need to go beyond service patterns and front-end redesigns. We need to tackle the data challenge head-on: not just with more technology, but with better decisions about how we gather, structure, and use information. Because only with good data can we deliver the great services the public deserves.
About Marvell Consulting
At Marvell, we’re passionate about helping the public sector deliver high-impact, sustainable digital change. We’ve supported departments and agencies across the UK central government, devolved administrations, and healthcare. Our multi-disciplinary teams combine research, design, and technical expertise to help clients build joined-up, user-centred services.
What unites all of our projects is a commitment to building with data in mind—from understanding the people behind the numbers to designing systems that generate and use information more effectively.
The techUK Central Government Programme provides a forum for government to engage with tech suppliers. We advocate for the govtech sector, evangelise tech as a solution to public sector challenges, facilitate market engagement, and help make the public sector an easier market to operate in. Visit the programme page here.
AI in central government: trends and opportunities
AI adoption across central government departments, agencies and arm's-length bodies. Where it's happening, how it's being implemented, and what it means for suppliers.
Our members develop strong networks, build meaningful partnerships and grow their businesses as we all work together to create a thriving environment where industry, government and stakeholders come together to realise the positive outcomes tech can deliver.
Associate Director, Central Government and Education, techUK
Heather Cover-Kus
Associate Director, Central Government and Education, techUK
Heather is Associate Director, Central Government and Education at techUK, working to represent the tech supplier community to Central Government.
She started as Head of Central Government at techUK in April 2022 and was promoted to Associate Director in August 2025 supporting both the Central Government and Education programmes.
Prior to joining techUK in April 2022, Heather worked in the Economic Policy and Small States Section at the Commonwealth Secretariat. She led the organisation’s FinTech programme and worked to create an enabling environment for developing countries to take advantage of the socio-economic benefits of FinTech.
Before moving to the UK, Heather worked at the Office of the Prime Minister of The Bahamas and the Central Bank of The Bahamas.
Heather holds a Graduate Diploma in Law from BPP, a Masters in Public Administration (MPA) from LSE, and a BA in Economics and Sociology from Macalester College.
Ellie joined techUK in March 2018 as a Programme Assistant to the Public Sector team and now works as a Programme Manager for the Central Government Programme.
The programme represents the supplier community of technology products and services in Central Government – in summary working to make Government a more informed buyer, increasing supplier visibility in order to improve their chances of supplying to Government Departments, and fostering better engagement between the public sector and industry. To find out more about what we do, how we do this and how you can get involved – make sure to get in touch!
Prior to joining techUK, Ellie completed Sixth Form in June 2015 and went on to work in Waitrose, moved on swiftly to walking dogs and finally, got an office job working for a small local business in North London, where she lives with her family and their two Bengal cats Kai and Nova.
When she isn’t working Ellie likes to spend time with her family and friends, her cats, and enjoys volunteering for diabetes charities. She has a keen interest in writing, escaping with a good book and expanding her knowledge watching far too many quiz shows!
Junior Programme Manager - Central Government, techUK
Charles Bauman
Junior Programme Manager - Central Government, techUK
Charles Bauman is a Junior Programme Manager in the Central Government Programme at techUK.
He supports the programme’s mission to represent the technology supplier community to the UK government and advocate for digital innovation to address public sector challenges. Charles helps facilitate market engagement, foster partnerships, and ensure that tech suppliers and the government work collaboratively to improve outcomes, deliver value for money, and enhance public services for citizens.
Before joining techUK, Charles gained significant experience in research, analysis, and strategic advisory roles. At H/Advisors Cicero, he specialised in public affairs and corporate communications, while at Verdantix, he supported sustainability research and advisory projects, focusing on regulatory and environmental challenges.
Charles holds an MSc in Theory and History of International Relations from the London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE) and an MA in Medieval History from King’s College London.
Charles enjoys volunteering with a think tank, reading, hiking, and spending time with his dog and family outside of work.