Modernising the courts means more accessible justice for all (part 2)
Guest blog:
In the second part of this article, I’ll talk about the need for the courts to move on from a sticking plaster approach to digital transformation and maximise its potential to make justice accessible to all.
As we explored previously, courts are undoubtedly using more technology than ever before, but it’s still limited to specific tasks - there is no evidence that they’ve “fully” embraced technology.
The key challenges facing them remain:
Access - given the unequal access in our society to devices, broadband and skills, we risk a digital divide developing if we don’t have a comprehensive approach that enshrines access to justice for all and reduces the barriers for those in digital poverty.
Fairness - Artificial Intelligence (AI) offers the promise of streamlining decision-making in sentencing, parole and allocating judges, among many other possible roles. This would clear backlogs and speed up the dispensation of justice. There are some promising examples around the world of its application in assisting justice systems, for example using algorithms that amplify and improve the decision-making process for risk assessments or for proactive policing.
Security - with court records and proceedings moving to digital platforms, how do we ensure that sensitive data isn’t stolen or misused, and that proceedings aren’t subverted or sabotaged by malicious intruders?
Skills - we can’t leave the people who are responsible for dispensing justice behind as we move to new digital ways of working. This means that any programme must have people at its centre – understanding their needs and concerns and providing the training they need to be productive and engaged.
The answers to all these concerns revolve around two fundamental success criteria: we need a coherent, joined-up approach that drives technology decisions and we need quality, accessible data.
A coherent approach provides a clear vision for an end-to-end justice system — and what that means in terms of overall outcomes for its users - as opposed to fixating on specific technologies in themselves as the solution. They may be part of the picture but they’re not the whole solution.
And by quality, accessible data I mean data that’s accurate, complete and collected right across the judicial journey, from before someone appears in court to long afterwards, so that we can design the right systems and processes to cater for everyone. As strategy guru Geoffrey Moore famously said: “Without big data, you are blind and deaf and in the middle of a freeway.”[1]
Dr Natalie Byrom, Director of The Legal Education Foundation and a fellow speaker at the recent ‘Next steps for court modernisation’ seminar, said in the Foundation’s report that “capturing data is vital for ensuring the system is working fairly”.
Take the issue of access. If we don’t have the right data, how do we know who’s vulnerable and in need of support? If we don’t accurately record and analyse every interaction between citizens and the courts, and make data-driven decisions, how do we know whether we’re getting it right, and improve where we need to? We need sound data to ensure that everyone, including vulnerable people, has equal access to justice.
AI is another example of the importance of data. The major concern here is bias and lack of transparency in decision-making. The best way to counter bias is to ensure that the algorithm has quality, complete data (not just a lot of it) to work with. Transparency is also vital: the algorithm’s inner workings must be open and explainable to all, and so must the data that drives it.
Data infrastructure, policy, processes and access must be designed up-front with security as a core principle. It should be intrinsic to how data is used, not a separate layer. And we’ll need a coherent digital security policy to make sure we don’t end up with haphazard implementations and inconsistencies that give cyber criminals a way in.
Upskilling courts staff so that they’re ready for digital ways of working will take more than good data, but here too it’s the starting point. What skills do we have? Where are the gaps? And, as training starts, are we closing those gaps? Are we seeing progress in the right areas? Accurate, accessible answers to these questions will allow courts to make the best use of their people.
There’s plenty of inspiration to be found from the progress that’s been made in other countries - as of February 2020, there were more than 81.5m judgments and other judicial documents on the China Judgments Online website, representing the world’s largest digital repository of judicial information. Several European countries are using automated decision-makingsystems for justice administration, especially for the allocation of cases to judges, for example in Georgia, Poland, Serbia and Slovakia.
The pandemic has demonstrated that there’s enormous potential in virtual justice platforms and we have something very tangible to build on. Now we have to focus on developing a coherent approach and using quality data to solve the challenges of access, fairness, security and skills in delivering a truly transformative digital courts system.
Georgie joined techUK as the Justice and Emergency Services (JES) Programme Manager in March 2020, then becoming Head of Programme in January 2022.
Georgie leads techUK's engagement and activity across our blue light and criminal justice services, engaging with industry and stakeholders to unlock innovation, problem solve, future gaze and highlight the vital role technology plays in the delivery of critical public safety and justice services. The JES programme represents suppliers by creating a voice for those who are selling or looking to break into and navigate the blue light and criminal justice markets.
Prior to joining techUK, Georgie spent 4 and a half years managing a Business Crime Reduction Partnership (BCRP) in Westminster. She worked closely with the Metropolitan Police and London borough councils to prevent and reduce the impact of crime on the business community. Her work ranged from the impact of low-level street crime and anti-social behaviour on the borough, to critical incidents and violent crime.
Programme Assistant, Markets and International Trade, techUK
Jago Corry
Programme Assistant, Markets and International Trade, techUK
Jago joined techUK in July 2022 as a Programme Assistant to Financial Services, Justice and Emergency Services and International Trade. Prior to joining techUK, Jago studied an MSc in European and Global Governance at the University of Bristol.
Programme Manager, Health and Social Care & Justice and Emergency Services, techUK
Robert Walker
Programme Manager, Health and Social Care & Justice and Emergency Services, techUK
Robert joined techUK in October 2022, where he is now Programme Manager for Health and Social Care & Justice and Emergency Services.
Robert previously worked at the Pension Protection Fund, within the policy and public affairs team. Prior to this, he worked at the Scottish Parliament, advising politicians and industry stakeholders on a wide range of issues, including rural crime and health policies.
Robert has a degree in Politics and International Relations (MA Hons) from the University of Aberdeen, with a particular focus on strategic studies and energy security. Outside of work he enjoys activities such as running, rugby, boxing and cooking!
Georgina is techUK’s Associate Director for Local Public Services
Georgina works with suppliers that are active or looking to break into the market as well as with local public services to create the conditions for meaningful transformation. techUK regularly bring together local public services and supplier community to horizon scan and explore how the technologies of today and tomorrow can help solve some of the most pressing problems our communities face and improve outcomes for our people and places.
Prior to techUK, Georgina worked for a public policy events company where she managed the policy briefing division and was responsible for generating new ideas for events that would add value to the public sector. Georgina worked across a number of portfolios from education, criminal justice, and health but had a particular interest in public sector transformation and technology. Georgina also led on developing relationships across central and local government.
If you’d like to learn more about techUK, or want to get involved, get in touch.
Raya Tsolova is the Programme Manager for National Security at techUK.
Raya is responsible for all National Security related activities across techUK, specifically in the established programmes of Defence, Cyber Security and Justice & Emergency Services. Raya will leverage relationships with existing stakeholders across the three programmes, and will build new relationships between techUK and key stakeholders who are of interest to member companies.
Prior to joining techUK, Raya worked in Business Development for an expert network firm within the institutional investment space. Before this Raya spent a year in industry working for a tech start-up in London as part of their Growth team which included the formation and development of a 'Let's Talk Tech' podcast and involvement in London Tech Week.
Raya has a degree in Politics and International Relations (Bsc Hons) from the University of Bath where she focused primarily on national security and counter-terrorism policies, centreing research on female-led terrorism and specific approaches to justice there.
Outside of work, Raya's interests include baking, spin classes and true-crime Netflix shows!
techUK members – we are calling on you to nominate a colleague who has made a significant contribution or positive difference to People, Society, the Economy, or the Planet through their work with technology.
Can you think of someone you'd like to nominate for our inaugural President's Awards? Nominations close on 26 April.