Decision automation is an inflection point for intelligent automation. Here’s why
techUK member Rainbird argues a new breed of intelligent automation technology that can reason in highly complex scenarios and automate decisions at rates that are 100 times faster and 25 per cent more accurate than humans is now possible, if you get deployment right. Part of techUK's Intelligent Automation Week. #AutomationUK
Gartner predicts that, by 2022, 90 per cent of organisations will be using robotic process automation (RPA). Of those that do, most will be doing so in the name of operational efficiency.
But, unrecognised by some, the growth curve of enterprise automation has hit an inflection point. The cause is a new breed of intelligent automation technology that can reason in highly complex scenarios and automate decisions at rates that are 100 times faster and 25 per cent more accurate than humans.
This new category of truly intelligent decision automation means it is now possible for organisations to not just drive efficiency but also create significantly better decisions and outcomes for clients. It is also engendering a new generation of digital robo-advisory tools and services that are auditable and therefore much more trustworthy.
The adoption of decision-automation technology in organisations typically stems from three key realisations.
Firstly, there is a tremendous cost to inconsistent human decision-making. Humans don’t just struggle with bias (of which there are over 180 types), but, as Daniel Kahneman’s work on human judgement shows, they also struggle with quality inconsistency (Kahneman terms this ‘noise’). Even decades of experience performing the same complex tasks (insurance underwriting, fraud analysis, medicine) does not insulate intelligent decision makers from common errors in their reasoning. To err is human, and in part that is because we cannot ‘propagate’ uncertainty and probabilities well when trying to reason an optimal answer.
Intelligent automation technology now exists so organisations of any kind can augment huge swathes of company decision making that is traditionally assigned to employees. Powerful inference engines ensure that staff can make higher quality decisions consistently and quickly, enabling them to focus on the things technology is poor at, such as being creative, building rapport with and listening to customers.
Secondly, RPA and decision trees can’t handle the complexity required to reason when making the types of decisions that most organisations need to automate. We are addicted to the simplicity of ‘if-this-then-that’ logic, but it only gets so far and quickly becomes completely unwieldy. The answer is not to create numerous decision trees that can cater for every outcome. Better to create holistic, reusable models of knowledge that do not place an upper limit on the level of complexity that can be handled. This multi-dimensional approach to knowledge modelling and decision automation is vastly more capable than the task-oriented automation of RPA alone.
Thirdly, machine learning can only deliver a prediction. That’s why so many firms have experienced problems when using machine learning to make judgements. Machine learning’s most common application is to analyse data, not automate judgements—at least in regulated markets where the rationale for a decision cannot be opaque. Apple’s credit card algorithm fiasco, in which male applicants received much better credit offers than female applicants did, illustrates a point that every organisation should understand. Machine learning alone can only provide a prediction and the judgement must come from elsewhere, usually a human.
However, truly intelligent automation technology can enable humans to retain ultimate control over how judgement is modelled and applied to data, rather than allow black box patterns derived from data to be imposed on humans.
Right now, banks are using truly intelligent automation to apply automated judgement to suspicious transactions that their machine learnt monitoring systems have flagged as potentially fraudulent.
Big Four accounting firms are using truly intelligent automation to productise the tax and advisory expertise of their accountants, amplifying their ability to scale critical business services to more customers, faster.
The NHS is using truly intelligent automation to automate COVID risk assessments for thousands of employees, using a model of occupational health expertise that took just six hours to build.
These examples are proof that the unstoppable trajectory of ‘intelligent automation’ has reached a new inflection point. Those who can join the journey will be able to harness the benefits of this new category, which is not only delivering efficiency; it's also empowering human workers to deliver demonstrably better outcomes for their clients and giving organisations an opportunity to create a new generation of digital products and services.
James Duez is a technologist, entrepreneur and the co-founder and CEO of Rainbird, a leading intelligent automation scale-up.
James has nearly 30 years of experience building highly successful and disruptive tech companies as well as leading strategy and operations, software engineering and business development functions in several industries. Bringing an astute focus to sustainable growth, James has helped some of the world’s largest organisations—including global retail banks, Big Four accounting firms and the NHS—transform growth and operations through exponential technology adoption.
Recognised as a committed and results-driven leader, James is one of Grant Thornton’s “Faces of a Vibrant Economy” and a member of US entrepreneur, investor and executive group “Abundance 360”. He has also been entrusted to advise state departments, including the UK Ministry of Defence and the US Department of Defense.
Rainbird is an intelligent automation platform that lets you automate complex decision-making, at scale. Rainbird’s automated decisions are typically 100x faster and 25% more accurate, while being fully explainable.
The Rainbird platform has two main parts: the studio (a no-code visual editor for modelling the decision-making processes of experts) and the inference engine (which uses the models created in the studio to automate decision making, at scale).
Laura is techUK’s Head of Programme for Technology and Innovation.
She supports the application and expansion of emerging technologies across business, including Geospatial Data, Quantum Computing, AR/VR/XR and Edge technologies.
Before joining techUK, Laura worked internationally in London, Singapore and across the United States as a conference researcher and producer covering enterprise adoption of emerging technologies. This included being part of the strategic team at London Tech Week.
Laura has a degree in History (BA Hons) from Durham University, focussing on regional social history. Outside of work she loves reading, travelling and supporting rugby team St. Helens, where she is from.
Zoe is a Programme Assistant, supporting techUK's work across Policy, Technology and Innovation.
The team makes the tech case to government and policymakers in Westminster, Whitehall, Brussels and across the UK on the most pressing issues affecting this sector and supports the Technology and Innovation team in the application and expansion of emerging technologies across business, including Geospatial Data, Quantum Computing, AR/VR/XR and Edge technologies.
Before joining techUK, Zoe worked as a Business Development and Membership Coordinator at London First and prior to that Zoe worked in Partnerships at a number of Forex and CFD brokerage firms including Think Markets, ETX Capital and Central Markets.
Zoe has a degree (BA Hons) from the University of Westminster and in her spare time, Zoe enjoys travelling, painting, keeping fit and socialising with friends.