Sharing to succeed: From targets to outcomes – how collaboration between primes and SMEs can unlock government's SME ambitions
Guest blog by Sonya Anderson, Director, Central Government at CGI, and techUK Central Government Council member
This post is part of "Sharing to succeed" - a blog series from the techUK Central Government Council exploring how knowledge sharing and collaboration between buyers and suppliers can be a key to successful market engagement, resulting in procurements that support digital transformation. You can find the introduction to the series here.
Author
Sonya Anderson
Director, Central Government, CGI
With over 20 years of experience partnering with public sector clients, I specialise in designing, developing, and delivering complex technology projects, with a deep understanding of public sector challenges and a strong track record of driving successful outcomes in complex, high-profile projects. As a senior business development and client relationship professional, I have extensive expertise in shaping and delivering digital transformation initiatives in highly legislated areas such as elections and democracy, education and the justice sector, both internationally and in the UK. Currently I am a Director at CGI responsible for developing innovative proposals for clients in the Justice and Health sectors.
One of the things I value most about the techUK Central Government Council is the mix of organisations around the table. Large system integrators, mid-sized firms and SMEs all bring different perspectives, but are ultimately trying to answer the same question: how can we work more effectively with Government to deliver outcomes?
SME spending targets are a good example. They expose where SME engagement is working, where it is falling short and where barriers remain across procurement, commercial models and delivery.
It’s easy to fall into a narrative where primes and system integrators are seen as part of the problem, absorbing Government spending through large, complex contracts. The reality is more nuanced.
This blog reflects conversations across the Council, supported by research undertaken by CGI. I’ll start by being slightly provocative. A proportion of SME spend will inevitably flow through system integrators and prime contractors. Government does not have the capacity to manage hundreds of individual SME contracts across every major programme. The question isn’t whether primes have a role to play, it’s how they play it.
When prime contracts are in place, what does good look like for Government, SMEs, primes and ultimately citizens? Rather than focusing solely on targets, how can collaboration unlock both greater SME participation and better delivery outcomes?
From targets to outcomes
The Government’s renewed focus on SME spending targets is welcome. Department-level, ministerially owned targets create stronger accountability. However, targets alone will not shift the dial. Recent industry analysis suggests that only 11% of central Government procurement spend goes directly to SMEs, a figure that has remained broadly unchanged in recent years. At the same time, other parts of the public sector, particularly Local Government, have shown that much higher SME participation is achievable.
The challenge is no longer policy ambition, but execution. Collaboration sits at the heart of turning that ambition into delivery.
Levelling the playing field
One of the most effective levers available to Government is also one of the most underused: mandating meaningful SME participation within procurements. Done properly, this does more than increase SME spend; it levels the playing field. Every prime is required to build and deliver through an SME ecosystem, shifting the focus from whether SMEs are used, to how effectively they are integrated.
To drive real impact, SME participation should be:
Designed into the procurement and delivery model from the outset.
Evidenced and evaluated as part of bid quality.
Reflected in delivery governance, not just bid commitments.
Tracked and reported throughout delivery.
This moves SME inclusion from a compliance exercise to a collaborative delivery model.
Beyond “badgeless”: enabling real collaboration
The industry often talks about “badgeless teams”. Multiple suppliers working alongside Government within integrated delivery teams. In principle, this is exactly right. In practice, collaboration can still be constrained if SME engagement is fully mediated through the prime.
Departments increasingly want visibility of SME partners. They want direct relationships with specialists and open, two-way conversations. Those of us who understand the value SMEs bring know that no single organisation can do everything.
This is not about bypassing the prime. It is about making the ecosystem work properly.
Asad Ansari, Managing Partner at Mayfair IT Consultancy, comments:
“From an SME perspective, the most effective partnerships are those where we are brought in early, with a clear role in solving the problem, not just delivering a component. When there is strong alignment between the department, the prime and the SME, and open communication across all three, it allows us to deliver real impact. That triangulated relationship – client, prime and SME – is where the value is.”
Designing procurements that unlock SME value
If Government is serious about SME outcomes, procurement design needs to enable collaboration from the outset.
Anna Inman, Client Account Director at Digital Modus, explains:
“SMEs add most value when they are involved early in shaping the solution, not brought in later to deliver against a predefined specification. We must move beyond ‘partner in name only’ arrangements, where an SME is included to strengthen a prime’s bid but has little meaningful involvement in delivery.
SME engagement should be treated with the same seriousness as Social Value. It should be measured by procurement teams, including how well primes work with their supply chains and whether SME voices are heard in the room throughout the life of the contract.
That means allowing enough time for pre-market engagement, then backing it up with effective supplier relationship management and contract management. Done well, this helps SMEs, primes and Government co-develop better approaches, strengthen delivery and achieve better societal and economic outcomes.”
In practice, this means:
Bringing SMEs into solution design early.
Structuring work into clear, outcome-based packages.
Evaluating how suppliers will collaborate, not simply that they will.
If SMEs are only engaged once the solution is fixed, Government limits the innovation and fresh thinking it wants SMEs to provide.
Recognising commercial realities
For collaboration to succeed, it must reflect the commercial realities of both prime and SMEs. Primes often own overall delivery accountability, and the associated financial and SLA liabilities. This inevitably shapes commercial models and the way in which primes approach pricing, to manage that overarching risk. Whereas SMEs can find themselves operating within commercial arrangements they had little opportunity to influence.
If the goal is to maximize SME value, there’s an opportunity to think differently. Government can create discrete work packages that flow directly to SMEs, set SOW-level KPIs that reflect the work being delivered, use commercial models that reduce cost layering, and align contract incentives around shared outcomes. Collaboration should not simply be encouraged; it should be commercially viable.
From targets to transformation
If Government wants to accelerate SME participation, three things matter most:
Design SME involvement into procurements from the outset.
Create direct opportunities for SMEs to help shape solutions, not simply deliver them.
Measure the quality of SME engagement throughout delivery, not just spend at contract award.
SME targets remain an important catalyst for change. But the real opportunity lies in creating the conditions for Government, primes and SMEs to work together more effectively.
Ultimately, SME spend is not the goal; better public outcomes are. Those outcomes will be delivered through effective collaboration across the entire supplier ecosystem.
Central Government Programme activities
The techUK Central Government Programme provides a forum for government to engage with tech suppliers. We advocate for the govtech sector, evangelise tech as a solution to public sector challenges, facilitate market engagement, and help make the public sector an easier market to operate in. Visit the programme page here.
AI in central government: trends and opportunities
AI adoption across central government departments, agencies and arm's-length bodies. Where it's happening, how it's being implemented, and what it means for suppliers.
Our members develop strong networks, build meaningful partnerships and grow their businesses as we all work together to create a thriving environment where industry, government and stakeholders come together to realise the positive outcomes tech can deliver.
Associate Director, Central Government and Education, techUK
Heather Cover-Kus
Associate Director, Central Government and Education, techUK
Heather is Associate Director, Central Government and Education at techUK, working to represent the tech supplier community to Central Government.
She started as Head of Central Government at techUK in April 2022 and was promoted to Associate Director in August 2025 supporting both the Central Government and Education programmes.
Prior to joining techUK in April 2022, Heather worked in the Economic Policy and Small States Section at the Commonwealth Secretariat. She led the organisation’s FinTech programme and worked to create an enabling environment for developing countries to take advantage of the socio-economic benefits of FinTech.
Before moving to the UK, Heather worked at the Office of the Prime Minister of The Bahamas and the Central Bank of The Bahamas.
Heather holds a Graduate Diploma in Law from BPP, a Masters in Public Administration (MPA) from LSE, and a BA in Economics and Sociology from Macalester College.
Ellie joined techUK in March 2018 as a Programme Assistant to the Public Sector team and now works as a Programme Manager for the Central Government Programme.
The programme represents the supplier community of technology products and services in Central Government – in summary working to make Government a more informed buyer, increasing supplier visibility in order to improve their chances of supplying to Government Departments, and fostering better engagement between the public sector and industry. To find out more about what we do, how we do this and how you can get involved – make sure to get in touch!
Prior to joining techUK, Ellie completed Sixth Form in June 2015 and went on to work in Waitrose, moved on swiftly to walking dogs and finally, got an office job working for a small local business in North London, where she lives with her family and their two Bengal cats Kai and Nova.
When she isn’t working Ellie likes to spend time with her family and friends, her cats, and enjoys volunteering for diabetes charities. She has a keen interest in writing, escaping with a good book and expanding her knowledge watching far too many quiz shows!
Junior Programme Manager - Central Government, techUK
Charles Bauman
Junior Programme Manager - Central Government, techUK
Charles Bauman is a Junior Programme Manager in the Central Government Programme at techUK.
He supports the programme’s mission to represent the technology supplier community to the UK government and advocate for digital innovation to address public sector challenges. Charles helps facilitate market engagement, foster partnerships, and ensure that tech suppliers and the government work collaboratively to improve outcomes, deliver value for money, and enhance public services for citizens.
Before joining techUK, Charles gained significant experience in research, analysis, and strategic advisory roles. At H/Advisors Cicero, he specialised in public affairs and corporate communications, while at Verdantix, he supported sustainability research and advisory projects, focusing on regulatory and environmental challenges.
Charles holds an MSc in Theory and History of International Relations from the London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE) and an MA in Medieval History from King’s College London.
Charles enjoys volunteering with a think tank, reading, hiking, and spending time with his dog and family outside of work.