Skip to content

ESNZ Committee sets deadlines for Government action on climate change but what does it mean for the tech sector?

13 November 20265 min read
News
ESNZ Committee sets deadlines for Government action on climate change but what does it mean for the tech sector?

With COP31 underway, the House of Commons Energy Security and Net Zero (ESNZ) Committee has published a report which both welcomed progress on restoring the UK’s climate leadership, but is “very concerned by the lack of progress on delivering domestic climate adaptation actions”. 

The MPs warn that failure to act on the Climate Change Committee’s (CCC) recommendations is undermining the UK’s credibility internationally and is “already affecting human welfare in the UK”. To regain its status as a climate leader, the Committee says, Government must deliver on its existing 2030 NDC pledges while matching the higher ambition of the 2035 NDC and the Seventh Carbon Budget. 

What the Committee recommends 

  1. A National Framework for Climate Services. Proposed by the Met Office, this would set clear standards for everyone to work within and would provide “a very powerful mechanism to accelerate adaptation and UK economic leadership”. 

  2. A plan, measures and legislation on adaptation in this Parliament. The Committee wants the CCC’s proposed objectives and targets, which prepare for 2°C of warming by 2050, to inform the next national adaptation plans due in 2028. 

  3. A quarterly traffic-light rating of climate policy. Government should develop a system rating how well climate policies in each sector address the risks they face, giving a clearer picture of where adaptation is falling short. 

  4. A national electrification strategy. DESNZ should immediately publish a clear electrification strategy to close the gap between the UK’s 2030 NDC commitments and what current policy will deliver. 

  5. A climate finance delivery plan. With ODA falling to 0.3% of GNI by 2027, the Committee calls international climate finance “the Achilles’ heel of UK climate leadership”. It wants a single cross-government plan with multi-year commitments and a dedicated adaptation target, plus annual progress updates. 

  6. A fossil fuel phase-out roadmap . Government should publish a roadmap, as France, Germany and the Netherlands have done, ahead of the 2nd International Conference on the Just Transition Away from Fossil Fuels. It should also lead a reframing of the Global Clean Power Alliance and make energy and climate security central to the UK’s 2027 G20 Presidency. 

  7. A new whole-of-government approach. The MPs are “unconvinced that Whitehall’s siloed policy-making architecture is fit for this purpose”. They find that the new climate security taskforce’s remit “lacks ambition”, and urge Government to publish the membership, agendas and minutes of the Clean Power mission board. 

Why this matters for the tech sector 

The report repeatedly links credible climate policy to private sector delivery. The MPs argue that acting on the CCC’s advice would give Government “the credibility for enrolling the private sector in national adaptation and decarbonisation efforts”. For the tech sector, some of the recommendations stand out clearly:  

  • Climate data and services 

A National Framework for Climate Services and a RAG risk system will both rely on high-quality climate data, modelling and analytics. Government should draw on the expertise of UK tech firms, and techUK members, across the likes of earth observation, AI-enabled forecasting, digital twins and risk analysis. So much value is being created in the private sector that can be utilised rather than replicated.  

  • Electrification needs a digital grid 

Almost doubling the pace of emissions reduction means smart, flexible networks, demand-side response and better data sharing across the energy system. An electrification strategy should treat digitalisation as fundamental and give clarity on grid connections for digital infrastructure the economy depends on. It also notes that extreme heat affects all types of generation while driving up demand. 

  • Resilient digital infrastructure 

Data centres, telecoms networks and the services built on them are increasingly exposed to extreme heat, flooding and other weather events. New adaptation legislation for CNI should be developed with industry and be proportionate, strengthening resilience without duplicating existing reporting. 

  • Joined-up government 

The Committee’s point about silos will resonate with techUK members. Climate, energy and digital policy cut across multiple government departments, and better coordination would support both net zero and the UK’s digital ambitions. This is particularly pertinent with greater resources than usual currently being spent on machinery of government changes.  

What's to come in 2027   

The Government will respond to the ESNZ Committee's report within the next couple of months, with 2027 shaping up to be a significant year in climate policy. These moments offer a real opportunity for the tech sector to shape how Government approaches adaptation, electrification and climate risk. 

techUK is now planning its 2027 climate and sustainability priorities, and we want members to help shape them. Which of these recommendations matter most to your business? Where can technology make the biggest difference and where are the barriers?  

If you’d like to feed in, please get in touch with me at Joshua.Turpin@techUK.org.